gre issue写作优秀实例：法律公正问题.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 gre issue写作优秀实例：法律公正问题 以下是gre考试写作部分issue的优秀写作实例，通过这些优秀范文 或是习作，考生可以借鉴里面的短语、句子或思路，给自己的写作找一 些思路和灵感。 题目： There are two types of laws: just and unjust. Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and, even more importantly, to disobey and resist unjust laws. 有两种法律：公正的和不公正的。每个社会成员都有责任遵守公正 的法律，但是更重要的是，更应该不遵守和反抗不公正的法律。 正文： Laws, body of official rules and regulations, are used to govern a society and control the behaviors of its members. In my observation, it is extremely presumptuous to assert that we have the right to obey just laws and disobey the unjust laws. As a social member, we are incumbent to not violate any laws, at the same time; we might turn to appropriate means to repeal the unfavorable laws. At the threshold matter, the line between just and unjust is difficult to draw, according to discrepant peoples beliefs, interests, experiences. There is no exaggeration to say that just or unjust is an subjective matter somehow, hence, different people might hold sheer dissimilar viewpoints toward one case. Then legislation, the sublime guidance for all the people who lives the society, how to define such an subjective matter? Needless to say, it is beyond mankinds imagination. Take the controversial issue abortion, into account. Those who hold religious belief might have intensive contradiction with such laws flavored with the sanction of abortion, for the simple reason that lives has come into being from their religious perspective. Meanwhile,those people who deem merely infants possess lives have the justification to substantiate the right to abortion as a just law. As a result, people of different culture backgrounds have conflicts with each other due to the concept of just and unjust.That is to say, we need not go further to bother the definition of just or unjust laws, for any single law can not so circumspect that it satisfies any member’s interest and propensity. Furthermore, as social members, we have no sound reason