A different method of treating acute myocardial ischemia electrocardiogram and effects of endothelin.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 15 A different method of treating acute myocardial ischemia electrocardiogram and effects of endothelin [Abstract] [Objective] To observe the difference in the treatment method (stasis law, Tong Yang Huo Tan law and the aroma Warming France) on behalf of parties against acute myocardial ischemia. [Method] SD rat 80 were randomly divided into normal control group, model group, Xuefuzhuyu Tang high-and low-dose group (dose, respectively 20.5,6.8 g * kg-1 * d-1), Gualou Xiebai Decoction high-and low-dose group (dose, respectively 18.0,6.0 g * kg-1 * d-1), Guan Xin Su He capsules high-and low-dose group (dose, respectively 0.19,0.06 g * kg-1 * d -1), using tail vein injection of pituitrin (Pit, 1.5U/kg) copy the model of acute myocardial ischemia; observed 3 different treatment in France on behalf of parties on the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial ischemia model in rats and plasma endothelin ( ET) impact. [Results] (1) In the ECG, the various drug groups compared with model group, ST segment shift amplitude difference was significant (P amp;lt;0.05 or P amp;lt;0.01); France on behalf of various parties in the treatment of high-and low-dose groups comparison, the differences were statistically significant (P amp;lt;0.05 or P amp;lt;0.01). (2) plasma ET levels, different treatment of France on behalf of parties in high-dose group and model group, plasma ET levels of the differences were statistically significant (P amp;lt;0.01); France on behalf of various parties in the treatment of high-dose groups comparison, in which Xuefuzhuyu Tang ET plasma levels of high-dose group was significantly lower than Gualou Xiebai Decoction high-dose group (P amp;lt;0.01), and Guan Xin Su He capsules of high-dose group (P amp;lt;0.05), while the Gualou Xiebai Ban Xia Tang and Guan Xin Su He capsules was no difference between high-dose group was significant (Pamp;gt; 0.05); France on behalf of various parties in the treatment of low-dose group compared