China Real Estate Criticism- a lack of competition of the pseudo-market-oriented industry.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 13 China Real Estate Criticism: a lack of competition of the pseudo-market-oriented industry In the real estate of this circle is slightly mixed a little longer, would have heard a lot of difficulties in other sectors have heard and seen that many in other industries is difficult to see. For example ‘price fell to 15% also handles can not afford to, they no longer need to cut prices, and placed around the popular two-a-wang, the project may be dead back to life the’; such as ‘The CBD project is Vice-Chairman Liu (CPPCC) in doing’; Another example is ‘Officer for one, will die a number of developers’ and so on. These are the blending mean? As expressed in the title of this article: China Real Estate is a lack of competition of the pseudo-market-oriented industry! Why is lack of competition Representation from some of the market point of view, the current real estate industry seem to be already have a considerable degree of competition, if a group of figures, two phenomena: A set of figures: National existing 32,000 real estate companies (in 2001, conducted by the statistics, such as including businesses operating without licenses, a total of 51,901 homes), ‘enough to go round’, of which 2 / 3 of enterprises to adapt to tasks lack of profit or loss in the low state (at least it’s yes). Two phenomena: In order to win from the competition, real estate enterprises are lots warfare and supporting warfare, the product quality of the war, the concept of endless war, and so various means, to try to create a differentiated and ‘first’ in real estate, and have to refine the selling points, in the form and intensity of the publicity their brains increased intensity. Is the so-called ‘chaos of becoming For charming eyes’, and even consumers felt overwhelmed. In all around us there a lot of slow-moving real estate, and even some good sales of the project, many have also left about 10% of late. Is the above, are not sufficient to show the current