Clinical research design errors in the easily overlooked Analysis.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 14 Clinical research design errors in the easily overlooked Analysis Author: BI Jing-Feng, DUAN Jun-guo, LIU Zeng Min Abstract from different angles in clinical research design, especially in the design of research projects in some countries there is easily overlooked mistakes in analysis and summary, and recommendations on the design of rationalization. Keywords: clinical research; design; error In recent years, as China’s economic development, people’s health is also a corresponding increase in demand. Based on this social background, medical clinical research has been an unprecedented development. However, after the clinical research projects of past research found that many of the design, there are some easily overlooked errors. Now it is summarized below. A clinical research design was insufficient to prove the efficacy of experimental methods Effectiveness of the treatment is the core content of clinical research design, an effective treatment may be due to research and design errors, its effectiveness is questionable. Of the original research design issues are as follows: The 300 cases of facial paralysis were randomly divided into simple acupuncture group, single-point injection group, acupuncture point injection group. The main purpose of researchers from the three groups to choose the best treatment options, after statistical analysis, acupuncture point injection group and other groups are statistically significant difference. The researchers concluded: Acupuncture plus acupoint injection group was significantly better than the simple effect of acupuncture group and the pure point injection group. The reason why the researchers concluded that, based primarily on past experience, the three groups established facial paralysis treatment programs are effective. Researchers is an experience, rather than “recognized” in. Have proven effective treatment. Of course, the effect