Coping of Military Personnel State Trait Anxiety and Mental Health Research.docVIP

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 11 Coping of Military Personnel State Trait Anxiety and Mental Health Research Study: Iasi Wang, Peng Shun Zhou, Xu Quanhong, Zong-ying, Cheng Bo, Shi Xueli [Abstract] Objective To investigate the coping of Military Personnel, State Trait Anxiety and mental health. Methods A cluster random sample of Military Personnel 1560, the coping style scale, State Trait Anxiety Inventory, Symptom Checklist (SCL -90 test. Results SCL-90 and national norms than interpersonal relationship was no significant difference (Pgt; 0.05, the remaining items the scores were significantly higher (P lt;0.01), in addition respond to resolve the problem, help factor was significantly lower (0.13 + -0.15/0.28 + -0.22,0.21 + -0.19/0.46 + -0.26, P lt;0.01, the other four factors were significantly higher than the norm military, state - trait anxiety was significantly lower than sub-national norm, in addition to interpersonal relationships addition, SCL-90 factors and the coping styles in problem solving, help factor was a significant negative correlation (P lt;0.01, with the coping style of the other four factors and the state and trait anxiety scores were significantly correlated (P lt; 0.01, on the Tibetan Plateau, the mental health of the military order of trait anxiety, self-blame, problem solving, rationalizing (B = 0.015,0.17, -0.42,0.21). Conclusions of Military Personnel by coping styles Mental Health, State - Trait Anxiety effects. [Keywords:] Tibet, the military, coping style, state - trait anxiety, mental health ABSTRACT Objective To discuss the correlation of coping style and state-trait anxiety with mental health in military personnel in Tibet. Methods 1500 military personnel were selected by cluster random sampling and were tested with Coping Style Scale, State-trait Anxiety Scale and Symptom Checklist- 90 (SCL-90). Results In SCL-90, the interpersonal relationship factor scores of military personnel in Tibet showed no obvious difference from t