保温和普通混凝土建筑的消费者支付成本比较——以某绿色示范工程为例.pdfVIP

第 37 卷第 1 期 建筑经济 Vo 1.3 7 No.1 2016 年 1 月 CONSTRUCTION ECONOMY Jan. 2016 保温和普通混凝土建筑的消费者支付成本比较* 一一以某绿色示范工程为例 武智荣，刘元珍 (太原理工大学建筑与土木工程学院，山西太原 030024) 摘要:绿色建筑材料往往会产生一定的增量成本，影响其在节能建筑市场的应用。针对玻化微珠保温混凝 土和普通混凝土，以某绿色示范工程为例，运用 Dest-h能耗分析软件，测算建筑能耗成本及由此引起的环 境戚本，并结合建筑产品购买成本，揭示选用玻化微珠保温混凝土的建筑在寿命周期戚本方面的优越性， 为绿色建筑材料推广提供参考。 关键词:绿色建筑;保温混凝土;支付成本:节能 中图分类号: F407.9 文献标识码 :A 文章编号: 1002-851X (2016) 01-0093-04 DOI: 1O.l 41811j.cnki.1002-851x却 1601093 Comparison on ConsumersωtofH倒It Pr四ervation and Ordinary Concrete Building: Taking Green Demonstration Project as an Example WU Zhirong, LIU Yuanzhen (Schoo1 of Architecture and Civi1 Engineering, Taiyuan University ofTechnology, Taiyuan 030024, China) Abstract: Green building materials tend to cause certain incremental cost, which affects its application in energy? saving construction market. Taking a green demons1ration pr，句 ect as an example, on the basis of consumers cost, for vitrified beads insulation concrete and normal concrete, the paper measures the building energy consumption cost and the resulted environmental costs with the Dest-h energy consumption analysis software. Then combines with the construction products one-time pay cost, reveals the superiority of choosing vitrified beads insulation of concrete construction in the view of life-cycle cost, provides reference for application of green building materials. Keywords: green construction; heat insul