Mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy from 12 to 16 weeks clinical observation.doc

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 9 Mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy from 12 to 16 weeks clinical observation [Abstract] Objective mifepristone misoprostol termination of pregnancy. Methods using double blind to 16 weeks of gestation in 12 healthy women, 240 cases were randomly divided into test group and control group, experimental group was treated with m non-Division ketone and misoprostol, intra-amniotic injection of the control group for termination of pregnancy rivanol. Results of pregnancy termination effective test group was 90%, higher than the 87  50%, no significant difference between the two groups (P gt; 0  05. induction time test group was 33  25 h was significantly lower than the control group of 62  36 h (P lt;0  01. induction the amount of vaginal bleeding 24 h after the test group was 66 ml was significantly less than the control group of 108 ml (P lt;0  01. 30% of adverse test group was significantly higher than the 3  33% (P lt;0  01. Conclusion Mifepristone and misoprostol for termination of pregnancy is better than rivanol intra-amniotic injection method. [Keywords:] mifepristone, misoprostol, rivanol, termination of pregnancy [Abstract] Objective To study the effect of termination pregnancy on mifepristone and misoprostol.Methods Took double blinding to 240 health women of 12 ~ 16 weeks pregnancy who were randomized into the test group and the control group.Test group took orally mifepristone and misoprostol, control group by rivanol, surveyed effect of two groups.Results The test group amounted to effective rate for 90%, control group amount to effective rate for 87  50%, two groups had no statistics significance (Pgt; 0  05.Induced labor time of the test group 33  25 hour was lower than the control group 62  36 hour (P lt;0  01.Induced labor 24 hour vaginal flux blood of the test group 66 ml was less than the control group 108 ml (P lt; 0  01.Side-effect of the test group 30% was higher than the contro