网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

Misunderstanding the brand under the magnifying glass.doc

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Misunderstanding the brand under the magnifying glass

 PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 20 Misunderstanding the brand under the magnifying glass In recent years, the domestic marketing, brand research sector formed a boom. Many of them refreshing the content, but there are some vague things, we in practical work, should pay special attention to two areas: common errors and some paradoxical point of view. For the former should be careful to avoid, for the latter need to be clarified in the debate, in order to avoid miscommunication error, committed by ‘the sun around the earth’ understanding of the error. Mistakes of misunderstanding! A few years ago (about 97 years) had read an article, the main stress related issues between products, the text to the effect that: enterprises to introduce new products, should be considered with the previous product interaction. Citing two examples: Chengdu Mathias Woo’s’ Jieeryin lotion ‘was very successful and then launch a’ good baby oral Friends’ is far from satisfactory; Yantai Rongchang’s’ Rongchang anal Thailand ‘with subsequent’ Sweet Dream Oral Liquid ‘is true. The reason is in front of the products ‘Jieeryin’ and ‘anal Thailand’ easy to give the impression left unclean, so that affects the back of new products introduced in ‘good baby-you’ and ‘Sweet Dream’. At that time some careful thought, though not agree, but did not expect to refute. But recently also in the ‘world’s Manager’ magazine to see a ‘brand extension three noes policy’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘brand’) of the article, also referred to Rongchang example, as a bad argument Lenovo can not help but surprise: like this point of view can not withstand scrutiny as a classic case of promoting Mody? Mathias and Rongchang these two examples quite interesting on the surface is very convincing, but a closer one would like to have hardly agree. Because if we follow the same logic, we can not explain this phenomenon: the first one in Guizhou magic product ‘athlete’s foot a net’ did not make the subsequent ‘Cough Syrup’ patient

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档