- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Multinational corporations that should review their own
PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 8
Multinational corporations that should review their own
Multinational corporations have angrily, but still came up with ‘to Beijing Gao Yuzhuang’ idea.
June 24, 2005, Procter amp;amp; Gamble, L’Oreal cosmetics and so on more than 10 multinational companies gathered in Beijing, and the State Administration of Commerce and Industry, Ministry of Commerce and other relevant government officials face to face ‘communication’, Yu Wei own ads playback path of argument.
In recent months, the multinational corporations that are ‘very hurt’, that they spend millions on ads produced by the Chinese media launch soon, they were stopped by the competent authorities. The reason is that the competent authorities, their advertisement alleged false, misleading consumers components. But the multinationals are not satisfied, they believe that their advertising is ‘objective, true and there is sufficient data to support the’ yes ‘fully consistent’ Advertising Law ‘and’ The People’s Republic of China Against Unfair Competition Law ‘relevant provisions’.
To multinational companies, led by Procter amp;amp; Gamble who has always been the brand and product advertising as a pioneer in marketing weapon, a sudden hard was ordered to halt production of the ads, which allow them to accept some bad. Procter amp;amp; Gamble has been involved in a similar incident more than once, and following the SK-II advertising the event in question to a fine after a few days ago was traced to the Pantene, Head amp;amp; Shoulders, Safeguard four brand advertising in connection with the Crest mislead consumers.
Procter amp;amp; Gamble do feel very ‘angry’.
However, what is all this blame? The Chinese government’s ‘ad law’ is too old, too harsh, too rigid, or the competent authorities of splitting hairs, purposely making things difficult? Is the malicious instigation of a competitor, or the media and consumer insight is too harsh? Is the advertising practices of the humble and low-
您可能关注的文档
- MRI diagnosis of meniscus injury.doc
- MRI diagnosis of bacterial meningitis.doc
- MRI diagnosis of knee meniscus injury.doc
- MRI diagnosis of traumatic bone infarction and differential diagnosis.doc
- MRI diagnosis of uterine fibroids experience of 31 cases.doc
- MRI for the diagnosis of acute aortic dissection.doc
- MRI examination in the scanning sequence of the preferred Frue FISP diagnosis of ampullary carcinoma.doc
- MRI in cerebellar hemangioblastoma diagnosis of.doc
- MRI in cerebellar hemangioblastoma diagnosis of_0.doc
- MRI in rectal cancer diagnosis and preoperative staging of.doc
文档评论(0)