南海仲裁案菲律宾第四项诉求辩驳——以低潮高地能否被占据为视角.pdfVIP

第27 卷第2 期 中国海商法研究 Vol. 27 No.2 Chinese Journal of Maritime Law 2016 年6 月 Jun. 2016 胡谦，张永坚南海仲裁案菲律宾第四项诉求辩驳-一以低潮高地能否被占据为视角[1].中国海商法研究，2016 ， 27(2) :16-25 南海仲裁案菲律宾第四项诉求辩驳 一一以低潮高地能否被占据为视角 胡谦1 ，张永坚2 (1.华东政法大学国际航运法律学院，上海 2(削42;2. 大连海事大学法学院，辽宁大连 116026 ) 摘要:中菲南海仲裁案中，菲律宾诉求涉及了低潮高地的法律地位问题。不仅条约国际法对于低潮高地能否通 过占据取得主权并没有直接规定，而且从国际司法判例、国家实践以及学说等方面所进行的归纳研究来看，也尚未 形成习惯国际法明确接受或排除这种做法。由此可见，菲律宾单方面主张低潮高地不能够通过先占或其他方式取 得，缺乏相关国际法依据。 关键词:低潮高地;法律地位;南海仲裁案;占据;领土主权 中图分类号:0凹6 1. 9 文献标志码:A 文章编号:2ω6-028X(2016)02咽16-10 Refutting Philippines forth claim in SCS arbitration 一low-tide elevations capability of appropriation 1 2 HU Qian ,ZHANG Yong-jian ( 1. Intemational Shipping Law School ,East China University of Political Science and Law , Shanghai 2∞042 ， China;2. Law School ,Oalian Maritime University ,Oalian 116026 ,China) Abstract: Philippines forth claim in the arbitration on South China Sea involves the legal status of low-tide elevations. Not only does intemational treaty law keeps silence on the question whether low-tide elevations are capable of appropriation by oc- cupation or otherwise ,but from the analysis of case law ,state practice and the academic theories ,it is not yet established in the intemational customaηlaw that appropriation of low-tide elevations is unequivocally permitted or excluded. Therefore in the framework of intemational law ,Philippines claim is in the