刑法分则中罪状模式的比较分析和立法完善——兼与quot;既遂模式quot;论者商榷.pdfVIP

湖北警官学院学报 Jan.20 1O 2010 年 1 月 第 1 期总第 112 期 Jo田nal of Hubei University of Police No.l Ser.No.112 刑法分则中罪状模式的比较分析和立法完善 一一兼与既遂模式论者商榷 刘之雄 (中南民族大学法学院，湖北武汉 430074 ) [摘 要]对于需要处罚的未遂的故意犯罪，我国刑法分别通常以既遂为标本规定基本法定刑，但对于基本罪状 的规定则既不同于意大利刑法明示的既遂模式，也不同于德、日刑法在逻辑上隐含的既遂模式，而是一种非既遂模 式。这种法定刑上的既i运模式与罪状上的非既遂模式之间存在逻辑上的矛盾，也导致了学界对我国刑法分则中罪 状模式的误解，并由此支撑着一个虚假的犯罪既遂理论。我国刑法分别规定应当借鉴意大利刑法的既遂模式，将犯 罪的既遂要素明确规定在基本罪状中，并通过刑法分别的具体规定明确未完成行为的刑事可罚范围。 [关键词]罪状;法定刑;既遂模式;刑法完善 [中图分类号】D924.1 [文献标识码]A [文章编号] 1673-2391( 2010 )01-{)02萨-fJ7 Comparative Analysis and Lawmaking Perfection of Crime Patterns Mode in Criminal Law Liu Zhixiong (South-central University for Nationalities , Wuhan 430074 , China) Abstract: Generally, the Criminal Law in China provides 也ndamental statutory sentence on ac∞mplished offense m也regardωnon-accomplished intentional Crime which needsωbe penalized, but the provisions of fundamental facts ab- out crime,which are diπèrent 齿。m也e ostensive accomplishment offense mode ofCriminal Law in ltaly, and the crytic ac- ωmplishment offense mode in logic of Criminal Law in Germany or Japan , are a kind of non-accomplishment offense mode.τnere exists logical contradiction between the accomplishment offense mode in statutory sentence and the non-ac- complishment offense mode in crime pa忧ems， which leaωωmisunder百tanding of crime pattems mode in Criminal Law inourcoun町 and then supports a false thωry of accomplished offense. The Criminal Law in our country should draw on the experience ofthe accomplishment offense mode ofCriminal Law in Italy,provide the factors o