GMAT阅读篇章结构之比较分析-智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资 料 GMAT阅读篇章结构之比较分析-智课教育 本节课的主要内容是GMAT阅读篇章结构之比较分析，教大家熟悉 这一类文章的特点并掌握正确的应对方法，顺利解答此类型的文章题目 。GMAT阅读篇章结构之比较分析，一起去看看吧。 比较分析类：文章开始呈现比较对象然后进行比较分析(按时间、内 容等)最后显示出作者的态度评价。 例：Two works published in 1984 demonstrate contrasting approaches to writing the history of United States women. Buel and Buel’s biography of Mary Fish (1736-1818) makes little effort to place her story in the context of recent historiography on women. Lebsock, meanwhile, attempts not only to write the history of women in one southern community, but also to redirect two decades of historiographical debate as to whether women gained or lost status on the nineteenth century as compared with the eighteenth century. Although both books offer the reader the opportunity to assess this controversy regarding women’s status, only Lebsock’s deals with it directly. She examines several different aspects of women’s status, helping to refine and resolve the issues. She concludes that while women gained autonomy in some areas, especially in the private sphere, they lost it in many aspects of the economic sphere. More importantly, she shows that the debate itself depends on frame of reference: in many respects, women lost power in relation to men, for example, as certain jobs (delivering babies, supervising schools) were taken over by men. Yet women also gained power in comparison with their previous status, owning a higher proportion of real estate, for example. In contrast, Buel and Buel’s biography provides ample raw material for questioning the myth, fostered by some historians, of a colonial golden age in the eighteenth century but does not give the reader much guidance in analyzing the controversy over women’s status.更多相关内容请点击》利用推理关系解答GMAT阅读类比题。 1.The primary purpose of the passage is to A examine two sides of a historiographical debate B call into question an author’s approach to a hist