- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
CTA联合D-DIMER在AAD中的诊断阈值.pdf
American Journal of Emergency Medicine 31 (2013) 1047–1055
Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect
American Journal of Emergency Medicine
journal homepage: www. elsevi er. com/ locate/ ajem
Original Contribution
A decision analysis to determine a testing threshold for computed tomographic
☆,☆☆,★
angiography and D-dimer in the evaluation of aortic dissection
R. Andrew Taylor MD a,⁎, Neel S. Iyer BA b
a Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
b School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Objective: The objective of this study is to determine at what probability of thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) to
Received 10 March 2013 use a computed tomographic angiography (CTA) or a D-dimer test.
Received in revised form 19 March 2013 Methods: We used decision analysis software to determine the testing threshold (TT) for 3 hypothetical
Accepted 23 March 2013 decisions when evaluating for TAD: (1) no testing vs CTA, (2) no testing vs D-dimer, and (3) CTA vs D-dimer.
One- and 2-way sensitivity analyses were performed to determine which variables were drivers of the TTs.
Results: We found TTs of 0.03%, 0.013%, and 0.6% for decisions 1, 2, and 3, respectively. For all 3 decisions,
文档评论(0)