Five Law distinguishing Confusable clause.docVIP

Five Law distinguishing Confusable clause Abstract: The author in his own teaching commonly used in the following five ways the difference between English clause effectively avoid confuse the concept and usage of their students in the learning and use of English in different clauses, and everyone in this Share. Keywords: Easily Confused clause reduction law replaced law Positioning method with the law solution saying Many students in the learning and use of English in different clauses confusing concept and usage between them, resulting in some of the error should not occur. Fact, each clause has its own characteristics, use the following The five Law, can help you distinguish between the different clauses in English. Use reduction, the difference between the the emphasized sentence and other clause The distinction emphasized sentence and other clauses the best way is a “reduction” If you get rid of it is / was ... that / who ... In other words, the sentences be able to restore the sentence was intended to complete the sentence is emphasized sentence type, on the contrary, other clauses such as: (Of 1 It was at nine yesterday that we met the film star (emphasized sentence (2It was nine yesterday when we met the film star. (Adverbial clause (3It was clear that he stole the bike and ran away. (Subject clause More than three sentences look similar structure, but only the first one to get rid of it was ... that ... after able to restore: We met the film start at nine yesterday ... So, the first one is stressed sentence, the second sentence when the boot time adverbial clause, the third sentence of the main language clause, it is a form of subject that the following sentence is a real subject, the sentence can be converted: That he stole the bike and ran away was clear .. Second, the use of “replacing” the difference between the attributive clause and other clauses Look at the following sentences, the difference between them is the