- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术临床疗效的对比研究
Advances in Clinical Medicine 临床医学进展, 2016, 6(1), 30-34
Published Online March 2016 in Hans. /journal/acm
/10.12677/acm.2016.61006
A Comparative Study of Clinical Efficacy of
Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal
Hysterectomy
1 1,2 2,3* 1 1
Kunyang Gao , Yongxian Zhang , Gaodong Zhou , Shaojun Fu , Xiaojuan Tian
1
Xunyang Population and Family Planning Service Station, Xunyang Shaanxi
2
2014 Grade Clinical Medicine, Xi’an Jiao Tong University, Xi’an Shaanxi
3
The People’s Hospital of Ankang City, Ankang Shaanxi
th th th
Received: Feb. 15 , 2016; accepted: Mar. 4 , 2016; published: Mar. 7 , 2016
Copyright © 2016 by authors and Hans Publishers Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.
Methods: The clinical data of 212 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal
hysterectomy in our station from May 2015 to May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Hospita-
lization time, surgical blood loss, operating time and complications postoperative of the two
groups were compared. Results: Exhaust time, incision length, hospitalization time and postoper-
ative complications in the vaginal hysterectomy group were superior to the abdominal hyste-
rectomy group (P 0.05). Operation time in the abdominal hysterectomy group is shorter than
that of the vaginal hysterectomy group (P 0.05). Differences of preoperative hemog
文档评论(0)