热电冷三联供的供冷方式的可行性分析与评价(国外英文资料).docVIP

热电冷三联供的供冷方式的可行性分析与评价(国外英文资料) Fire efficiency: (9) Type of? = 5% of the transmission loss rate for the grid. Due to power itself is exergy, and power grid transmission loss rate is low, so the grid exergy efficiency will be higher than the steam conveying pipe network of exergy efficiency, also is the advantages of distributed electric compression refrigeration. The analysis of 3.3steam lithium bromide absorption unit and electrocompression chiller 3.3.1 vapor bromide absorption unit Consumed by fire with steam libr absorption unit, in addition to the quantity of heat of steam input exergy, pump should also include the cold, the solution of the pump and the consumption of cooling water pumps and cooling tower fan power, so the consumption of steam libr absorption unit exergy is: (10) In the form, EN, C is the coolant pump, solution pump and cooling water pump and cooling tower fans total energy, kj/h. The fire used in the output of the lithium bromide absorption unit, which is the cold quantity of fire used for refrigerating water produced by the units output: (11) In the form, Qe is the refrigerant of the refrigerating unit, kj/h; TE for the chilled water temperature, ℃. Thus the fire was lost to: (12) Fire efficiency is: (13) 3.3.2 electric compression chiller With commonly used electric compression type water-cooled water chiller, for example, the exergy cost consumed by compressor, cooling water pump and cooling tower fan and consumption of electric energy, namely: (14) In the form, EN, C is the power used by the electric compression chiller, cooling water pump and cooling tower fan, kj/h. The benefit fire of the condensed-type water cooled chiller, the fire use loss and the fire efficiency are the same as the presentation and analysis of the steam bromide absorption unit. Consumed by steam libr absorption unit is heat, electricity consumed by a compression type water-cooled water chiller is electricity, so both in the traditional analysis method is not comparab