- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
静脉定位仪引导下肢网状静脉与毛细血管扩张症硬化治疗效果评价
静脉定位仪引导下肢网状静脉与毛细血管扩张症硬化治疗效果评价 [摘要] 目的 探讨ACCUVEIN AV400静脉定位仪引导下肢网状静脉与毛细血管扩张症的硬化治疗方法及疗效。 方法 选择2015年6~8月在河北医科大学第一医院诊断为下肢网状静脉与毛细血管扩张症的患者49例,将其随机分为两组。治疗组在ACCUVEIN AV400静脉定位仪引导下静脉注射泡沫或液体硬化剂,加压治疗,对照组直接注射泡沫或液体硬化剂。分析比较两组患者的治疗效果、治疗满意度和并发症等情况。 结果 两组患者治疗效果比较差异无统计学意义(tRidit = 1.261,P = 0.211),但是治疗组的治疗效果平均秩次(R1 = 0.541)略高于对照组(R2 = 0.459)。两组患者治疗满意度比较差异有统计学意义(tRidit = 2.943,P = 0.004),治疗组的治疗满意度平均秩次(R1 = 0.561)明显高于对照组(R2 = 0.439)。两组患者均发生不同程度的并发症,但治疗组并发症少于对照组。 结论 ACCUVEIN AV400静脉定位仪引导下肢网状静脉与毛细血管扩张症的硬化治疗能达到精准可视化硬化,穿刺成功率高,并发症少,更加方便、快捷、安全有效
[关键词] 静脉定位仪;硬化剂治疗;下肢;网状静脉;毛细血管扩张症
[中图分类号] R543.7 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1673-7210(2016)07(b)-0072-04
[Abstract] Objective To investigate the effect of sclerotherapy for reticular veins and telangiectasia of lower limbs under the guidance of ACCUVEIN AV400 vein locator. Methods Forty-nine patients diagnosed as reticular veins and telangiectasia of lower limbs in the First Hospital of Hebei University from June to August 2015 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group received foam or liquid hardener by intravenous injection under the guidance of ACCUVEIN AV400 vein locator, the control group received foam or liquid hardener injection. The therapeutic effect, treatment satisfaction and complications between the two groups were analyzed and compared. Results The therapeutic effect between the two groups had no statistically significant difference (tRidit = 1.261, P = 0.211), but the mean rank of treatment group (R1 = 0.541) was slightly higher than that of the control group (R2 = 0.459); the treatment satisfaction between the two groups had statistically significant difference (tRidit = 2.943, P = 0.004), and the mean rank of the treatment group (R1 = 0.561) was significantly higher than that of the control group (R2 = 0.439); both groups had varying degrees of complications, but the complications in the treatment group was less than that of the control group. Conclusion The sclerotherapy for reticular veins and telangie
文档评论(0)