基于等效性原则的快速压缩法试验对比研究.pdfVIP

第 15 卷第3 期 安全每勇军境工程 Vol. 15 No.3 2008 年 9 丹 Safety and Environmental Engineeríng Sep. 2008 基于等效性原则的快速压缩法试验对比研究 曹圈，聂良住 〈中固地璜大学工程学院实栓中心，武汉 (30074) 摘 要z 针对 10 种代表性土祥进行了 24h 压缩法和 1 h 快速压缩法对比试验，研究结果表明:1 h 快速压缩法与 24 h 压缩法比较，其al-2 和 E.存在着一致性或逼近性，符合试验方法镜化对应遵循的等效性原则;1 h 快速压缩法 大大缩短了试验历时，可节省时间 3.5 d.在测试精度要求不高的情况下，可以为工程勘察设计提供相关土工参数. 美键词:等效性原则;1 h 快速压缩法，24 h 压缩法z 试验对比研究 审理分类号:TU4 1l.5 文献标识码:A 文章自号 :1611-1556(200803-0111-04 Comparative Analysis of the Fast Compression Method ßased on Equivalence Principle CAO Gang , NIE Liang-zuo (Experiment Center , Faculty 0/ Engineering. China University 0/ Geosciences. Wuhan 430074 , China) Abstrad: The fast compression is a new experimental method that revises the data of soil compressed for only 1 h instead of 24 h. Compared with the 24 h compression method , this method 臼n shorten the experi- ment time and save 3. 5 d. When the measurement precision is of low requirement , the 1 h fast ∞mpres­ sion method can be used to provide correlative parameters for the engineering investigation and design. This research chooses 10 representative samples of soil , and makes the comparative experiments between 24 h compressíon method and 1 h fast compression method. The results indicates that. in comparison with those of the 24 h compression method , the a}-2 and E, of soil by 1 h fast compression method show consis- tency and approximation. lt is therefore an optimum experiment method in accordance with the equivalence principle. Key words: equivalence principle; 1 h fast compression method; 24 h compression method; comparative ex- penment 原理是在有辘限、双面上亨排水和施加垂向荷载