(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计(国外英文资料).doc

(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计(国外英文资料).doc

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计(国外英文资料)

(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计(国外英文资料) To sum up and reveal: the answer is great. Fractions like 1/3, when the numerator and the denominator dont have a common factor, were going to call it the simplest fraction. Students, you know what? We demand a reduction of a fraction is not the most fraction in scores, but the demand is not the most fraction in score into the minimalist score, that is to say, the reduction of a fraction of what the result should be final score? (student: the simplest score.) Q: who can give an example of what is the simplest score? Practice exploration. Q: what is the simplest score for the white rabbit? What is the other 3 why not the simplest fraction? Now, please choose one of the three points and then make an appointment in the group. Please tell the two students about the process of the contract. Lead the students to say: 1: I found there is common factor 2, 8 of 8 and 24 divided by 2 is equal to 4, divided by 2 is equal to 2, 4, 4, and 12 have a common factor of 12 divided by 2 is equal to 2, 12 divided by 2 is equal to 6, 6 and 2 have a common factor 2, 6 divided by 2 is equal to 3, 2 divided by 2 is equal to 1, so the third after the reduction of a fraction is equal to 8/24. 2: lets see, the biggest common factor of 8 and 24 is 8, which is equal to 8/24 = 1/3. Guide the student discussion: compare two classmates method, what is the difference? Which do you prefer? Let the students answer: both of these students were removed by the common factor of the numerator and the denominator, and the result was a third. In different places, the first method, except for a few times, the second method is only one, so I like the second one. Q: why does the second method go only one time? Answer: because he figured out the biggest common factor in the numerator and the denominator, so only one time. Q: do you think so? Answer: I like the first method, because the calculation is accurate, not easy wrong. Q: both approaches are available, but whichever approa

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档