(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计（国外英文资料）.doc

(北师大版)数学(五年级上册)《约分》教学设计（国外英文资料） To sum up and reveal: the answer is great. Fractions like 1/3, when the numerator and the denominator dont have a common factor, were going to call it the simplest fraction. Students, you know what? We demand a reduction of a fraction is not the most fraction in scores, but the demand is not the most fraction in score into the minimalist score, that is to say, the reduction of a fraction of what the result should be final score? (student: the simplest score.) Q: who can give an example of what is the simplest score? Practice exploration. Q: what is the simplest score for the white rabbit? What is the other 3 why not the simplest fraction? Now, please choose one of the three points and then make an appointment in the group. Please tell the two students about the process of the contract. Lead the students to say: 1: I found there is common factor 2, 8 of 8 and 24 divided by 2 is equal to 4, divided by 2 is equal to 2, 4, 4, and 12 have a common factor of 12 divided by 2 is equal to 2, 12 divided by 2 is equal to 6, 6 and 2 have a common factor 2, 6 divided by 2 is equal to 3, 2 divided by 2 is equal to 1, so the third after the reduction of a fraction is equal to 8/24. 2: lets see, the biggest common factor of 8 and 24 is 8, which is equal to 8/24 = 1/3. Guide the student discussion: compare two classmates method, what is the difference? Which do you prefer? Let the students answer: both of these students were removed by the common factor of the numerator and the denominator, and the result was a third. In different places, the first method, except for a few times, the second method is only one, so I like the second one. Q: why does the second method go only one time? Answer: because he figured out the biggest common factor in the numerator and the denominator, so only one time. Q: do you think so? Answer: I like the first method, because the calculation is accurate, not easy wrong. Q: both approaches are available, but whichever approa