期末考试essay 思路解析.pdfVIP

技术+环境 1. A long-distance flight consumes the same amount of fuel as a car does in several years time and causes the same amount of environmental damage. Some people think that we should discourage non-essential flights such as tourist air travel instead of limiting the use of cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 1. Prohibit non-essential flights/ long-distance  Fuel: Even if some emergent documents and particular goods like tropical fruits demand immediate delivery, it is unnecessary for most of the products to be sent by flight. Otherwise, fuel, one of the irreplaceable resources, will be exhausted. Thus, the government should encourage the use of environmentally- friendly cars, or other sort of automobiles for transportation.  Damage: From the perspective of environmental pollution, residents nearby will be interrupted by the great noise from airplane. Meanwhile, … 2. support use of cars  Fuel: Not every vehicle uses fuel, and factually double-deckers applying electricity generated by solar power exist in daily life. Therefore, the public should encourage/ vote for cars far from fuel for the protection of people ’s health and the ozone atmosphere.  Damage: Without consideration of the fact that most of the cars will produce exhausted air, the pollution they bring is less harmful than that caused by flight. 3. Conclusion:  Technology: less energy consumption/ raise the efficiency of energy using= relieve pressure to environment  Air Corporation: rearrange the line, changing the long-distance lines into short distance ones or lines using various forms of transport.  Government: provide financial support to citizens buying fuel for their cars and factories making research on cars using renewable resources. 技术对比 Early technological developments helped ordinary people and change their lives more than recent