施耐德产线设计-LADM for ETO.ppt

* * * * * * KEY INFORMATION: When we finished process architecture, 80% job has been done of building line architecture,next step its process architecture result. Comparison between the different solutions. Compare all solution based on cost analysis (e.g. Capital, Operator, Square meter…) to find the final one. Also we can compare the real capacity and capacity implement stage based on different solution. REMARK: MODIFICATION: Need some example Link to profitability * To do: Not Necessary to breakdown all Sub Assembly, it depends on the complexity of product/process * * * Make a page for category of the DFA guideline * KEY INFORMATION: Explanation of the file “Time standards for manual assembly”. It’s better to give an example how to determine “Activity”, “DVC external to process”, “Non quality”, “Uncertainty” and “DVC support functions” during the exercising. Then need to define the above red times (detailed red time items first, just like red time breakdown in LM diagnosis) for OTR, TSR and IE target determination. Check with COGS ,DVC cost Targeted But when we define UT, DT, we only take account of manual time unless operator waits when machine runs. Here the DT is not the total DT of all process, it just include the non-value added time REMARK: MODIFICATION: High light more about KD KER, especially for KD ( Industrialization responsibility to work with DE to optimize) Create some tool to help analyze the KD optimization ( add one separate page for KD analysis) * To do: To check SPS about the 30% “Elasticity”, “Flexibility” or “Agility”. To do: To check SPS about the 30% “Elasticity”, “Flexibility” or “Agility”. To do: To check SPS about the 30% “Elasticity”, “Flexibility” or “Agility”. KEY INFORMATION There will be not only one solution according:investment,flow,change over, flexibility,elasticity... KEY INFORMATION: When we finished process architecture, 80% job has been done of building line architecture,next step its process architecture result