Analyticalpredictionofspringbackbasedonresidual摘要.pptVIP

Analytical prediction of springback based on residual differential strain during sheet metal bending Authors and Presenter Paper Written By: H K Yi, D W Kim, C J Van Tyne, Y H Moon As Presented by: Garrett Bodily September 24, 2008 Introduction “Commercial finite-element programme for sheet forming simulation give good results in terms of formability, strain distribution, and wrinkling – but springback remains a phenomenon often reported as being difficult to simulate (page 118).” Introduction “As springback is strongly dependent on the part geometry and the materials used, it is not possible to give a general rule of thumb for its compensation (page 118).” The Problem “Even small angular springback in deep drawn structures may cause large spatial deformations and distortions of the whole part (page 118).” The Solutions This paper compares two analytical solutions to springback. Comparison Six cases used to compare methods. Differential Strain Method Calculate difference in loaded strain. Calculate difference in unloaded strain. Put results into equation. Example of Case 4 High Bending – Low tension Bending Moment Method Calculate bending moment in loaded part. Put results into equation. Example of Case 4 High Bending – Low tension Moment Equation Results Compare equations using 4 metals Pros Strain differential model is described well. Comparison of models is effective. New model is much simpler, mathematically speaking. Cons Bending moment model NOT well explained. The variable names and subscripts very confusing and hard to follow. The fact that no testing has been done destroys their credibility. References 1 1 Huang, H. M., Liu, S. D., and Jiang, S. Stress and strain histories of multiple bending–unbending springback process. Trans. ASME, J. Eng. Mater. and Technol., 2001, 123, 384–390. 2 Seo, D. G., Chang, S. H., and Lee, S. M. Springback characteristics of steel sheets for warm U-draw bending. Metals Mater. Int., 2003, 9, 497–501. 3 D’Acquis