群体心理与管理案例(国外英语资料).docVIP

群体心理与管理案例(国外英语资料) Group psychology and management case A certain school, decided to adopt the full attendence award system to strengthen the management of the full attendance bonus 20 yuan, if the class, group activities, political learning once absent, two time, there is no bonus this month. In the first month after the implementation of this method, the effect was very good. No one was absent or late, and the teaching order became normal. After two months, has been a serious and responsible teacher Wang, for sick leave for 2 days, the disease is not cured, came to work, but withheld month bonus; Li is often malingering, loose, after the person is full attendence award to the class, also. But the teaching effect is poor, the money was up; Zhao was late for 2 times in the first week of the beginning of the month, in his opinion, one month bonus has disappeared, so in a few weeks after work casually, why come to work on time? According to the above case, what do you think of full attendance incentive award? What do you think should be done to arouse the enthusiasm of teachers? Analysis Full attendence award (1) incentive method is not suitable for teachers. (2) its main reason is that it does not conform to the characteristics and reality of the work of teachers. Teachers work has its own characteristics, for example, teachers work is characterized by loosening and flexibility. To encourage teachers to perfect attendance award, not to stimulate the real. (3) encourage teachers should pay attention to teachers need to occupation achievement, is to encourage teachers to improve the teaching work, and full time teachers and could not explain the teaching work is good, nature of incentives to work for teachers. (4) this case is a practical case, and the analysis can be open. Motivation theory (two factor theory, etc.) or school organizational characteristics can be analyzed. But the main points mentioned above should be included. Two, report: the European Commission anno