新gre argument官方范文参考分析-智课教育旗下智课教育.pdfVIP

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 新gre argument官方范文参考分析-智课教育旗下智课教育 新gre argument官方范文重在参考，以及思路的拓宽，那么究竟 该如何合理利用这些范文呢？下面是笔者就范文的一些分析，仅供大家 参考。 新gre argument官方范文参考分析，首先看一下官方范文： In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports(swimming,boating,and fishing)among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however,and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the rivers water and the rivers smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is,therefore,sure to increase.The city government should for that reason devote more money in this years budget to reverside recreational facilities. 读了觉得思路很值得借鉴。首先分析题干是很重要的，读懂题目里 作者的逻辑结构，指出里面未经证实的假设或者隐含的前提，更重要的 是自己文章的逻辑结构要清晰，分析反驳地充分。 这个题目和我读到的帖子里的题目有些不同，觉得应该算基础类了 ，首先找结论，然后依次去看指出原因或者前提，再倒上去分析。 这题作者的结论就是：The city government should for that reason devote more money in this years budget to reverside recreational facilities. 得出这个结论是基于这样几个前提 前提1：居民更喜欢水上运动 ，证据 ：Survey 前提2：河水利用率低是由于水质问题，证据 ：居民的抱怨 前提3：river usage is sure to increase，因为do the river clean up 从满分范文来看，整片文章结构明朗 ，每段结构也很清晰。传统的 5段式 ，3个反驳点。 首段 ：While it may be true that the Mason City government ought to devote more money to riverside recreational facilities, this authors argument does not make a cogent case for increased resources based on river use.指出结论以及作者的文章逻 辑证明存在问题，没有其它多余的废话。 第二段 ：Citing surveys of city residents, the author reports city residents love of water sports先写作者如何认为 ，然后写 自己的 反驳，质疑Survey的准确性 ，加举例 ，连用了自己的3个假设进行反驳 。最后还加上觉得怎样才算好的论证。 第三段 ：Additionally, the author implies that residents do not use the river for swimming,boating,and fishing,despite their professed interest