英文-碾压混凝土坝RCC讲稿.docVIP

RCC as a New Construction Method （RCC作为一种新的施工方法） 8.1 General Construction Considerations (一般情况下施工过程需考虑的因素) ·There are considerable differences between vertical, block-by-block construction （垂直块状浇筑）of dams with conventional mass concrete and horizontal, lift-by-lift construction（水平通仓浇筑）of dams with RCC. · The construction plant for RCC is usually, less costly, and utilized at a higher capacity factor （利用率）than that required for conventional concrete gravity dams. ·But the fast pace of placement required to achieve the economies possible with RCC imposes a greater discipline (要求)on the planning, scheduling(进度), and coordination(协调) in the field between designer(设计) and contractor(承包商). ·The RCC design approaches described in Chaps. 4, 5, and 6 diverge(不同点在于….) in some construction procedures. · In all cases, however, the mixing(拌合), transporting(运输), spreading(摊铺), and compacting (碾压)of relatively large volumes of material are concentrated into a short time interval. In the United States, the time limit from mixing plant to final compaction is about 45 min. It is about twice that in Japan. In addition, the Japanese RCD method requires that lifts be cured (养护)for as long as 36 h before placement (浇筑)of the next layer of RCC. In the United states and elsewhere, the goal has nearly always been to come as close as possible to continuous placement of RCC. 8.1.1 Scheduling Construction scheduling for RCC is less forgiving than for mass concrete(大体积混凝土). Although some mix designs can have greater tolerances than conventional concrete, RCC is still a sensitive concrete and the critical path (关键路线)for placing RCC is focused on completing one lift at a time. There are no alternate monolithic (整块的、独块的)blocks to form or place while problems are being analyzed. To avoid costly delays over disputes on specification（规范）compliance（执行）, the authority to resolve engineering problems must be vested in a well trained field organization. Lines of communication between the project engin