基于802.11的视频数据传输协议概述.ppt

Loss Period – provides an idea of how many IP packets are lost if max error event occurs (16ms wide interference, for example) As resolution increases, video stream becomes more sensitive to errors. * * Why can’t one use ideas from 802.3 space? What make streaming harder in 802.11? How do we justify that 802.11 was designed for data (and not for streaming)? Mention that these challenges are general (not specific to video streaming) Video is more sensitive to these Highlight the fact that ‘wireless channel changes constantly’ while the wireless QoS mechanisms do not track the changing channel characteristics closely * * request report identifies channel with most available BW and acceptable noise level (channel survey). Mention only limitations only here. While one can send a new TSPEC to replace the existing one, there are no mechanisms to dynamically tweak (I need 100 msec more and later I need 50 msec less) * Data Duplication to mitigate packet loss consequences (send the same packet 3 times) Selective data drop (if destination resolution is known the source can drop data selectively) Slide-15 from 898 r2 can be included here as well Related to QoS Policy Establishing a QoS contract (negotiation) Monitoring QoS parameters Adaptation of QoS contract * * We need some talking points here – potential questions: how do you know finer AIFSN helps (simulation data? Or even we speculate is a good answer). * We have performed many tests with various access points in various homes. The graph on screen at the moment is an example of one test in one home. In the test we have 4 different access points and for each access point we assess the error rate when various transmission techniques are used. The first test is conventional IEEE 802.11 where any bit in error causes an entire packet to be dropped. The second test adds a forward error correction to the system used in the first test. The third test is based on looking at how many bits are in error in a packet. Note tha