过度反应终稿.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共30页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
过度反应终稿

BACK GROUND Fama:The effecient market hypothesis(EMH) hypothesis of rational man、Bayes rule (1)Barberis, Shleifer Vishny(BSV) —Representative bias by TverskyKahneman (2)Daniel, Hirshleifer Subramanyam(DHS) —OverconfidenceSelf-attribution Overreaction Hypothesis : (1)one of the most important challenging EMH (2)if stock prices overshoot their in trinsic values systematically as a result of excessive investor optimism or pessimism, the price reversals should be predictable from past price performance De Bondt Thaler : Does the stock market overreaction?(1985) —the first to observe the overreaction phenomenon in the US Paul Zarowin : Size, Seasonality, and Stock Market Overreaction(1990) —shows that the size effect explains what seems to be an overreaction effect Andrew Clare Stephen Thomas : The Overreaction Hypothesis and The UK Stockmarket (1)Use UK stock market (2)Control the company size Robert Shiller : Irrational Exuberance(2000) Other researches : Size 、Profit Message、Bid 表3.8 对1年期(n=12)的过度反应 表3.8 对1年期(n=12)的过度反应 There appears to be no significant difference between, for example, small losers (R11) and large losers (R51), and no significant difference between small winners (R15), and large winners (R55), although there is always a positive difference between the returns. 意思是说公司规模最大之输者和公司规模最小之输者之间没有显著区别;同样,公司规模最大之赢者和公司规模最小之赢者之间也没有显著区别。 This result suggests that there is no significant difference between the post portfolio performance of small and large firm. 表3.9 对2年期(n=24)的过度反应 表3.9 对2年期(n=24)的过度反应 检验1:We find a significant difference between the performance of the small and large firm portfolios. 小公司和大公司的收益有显著区别,拒绝零假设。 检验2:The results show that small firms are outperforming large firms, although the results are only statistically significant for equation (3.61), where large firms again appear to have significantly larger CAPM Betas than the small firm portfolios. 尽管只有式(3.61)特别显著,但总体小公司的业绩是超过大公司的 B组:Close inspe

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

dajuhyy + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档