行政强制法草案四审未过,行政阻力依旧（The draft law of administrative enforcement has not been tried, and administrative resistance remains）.docVIP

行政强制法草案四审未过,行政阻力依旧（The draft law of administrative enforcement has not been tried, and administrative resistance remains） The introduction of an administrative mandate, known as the trilogy of administrative code, appears to be under way for some time. On April 20, compulsory administrative law draft submitted to the standing committee of the National Peoples Congress for the fourth time, the law committee recommended that the standing committee to review, which means that the fastest when will the next review is likely to pass. According to the regulation of the legislative law, included in the review of the current session of the standing committee of, if put two years of review, or for not paying a vote after two years without consideration again, will be terminated, review is also become waste. As in 2005, 2007 and the third of 2009, this time the law is restarting the process in the draft, when a two-year deadline may be terminated. Review at this time, activate the legislation purpose, suggests lawmakers still hope the law will eventually pass. In fact, the law has been basically mature, also the time to pass. The reason is a review on some issues, a certain sense, because now we talk about strong color change, prompted lawmakers have to humbly. Professor mo yu chuan, executive director of the constitutional and administrative law research center of renmin university of China, told reporters. Empower and control The legislative provisions, the draft law after general SanShen if no different opinions can deliver a vote, and compulsory administrative law draft fourth review is already 6 years, the difficulty and complexity. This is closely related to the special attributes of administrative enforcement. Administrative enforcement by national force as the backing, legal consequences of civil rights and interests directly, is a kind of administrative punishment harsher measures, the profits and losses of administrative act has its rationality; but most administrat