输液时两种胶布粘贴法及拔针后两种按压方法的比较.pdfVIP

西部医学2008年3月第2O卷第2期 Med J West China，March 2008，Vo1．2O，No．2 415 输液时两种胶布粘贴法及拔针后两种按压方法的比较 杨 丹，何跃华，张仕淮，刘成霞，张德辽 (宜宾市第二人民医院，四川 宜宾644000) 【摘要】 目的 比较输液时两种胶布粘贴方法及拔针后两种按压方法的效果。 方法 从临床病例中选出101例 需要输液治疗的病人，采用自身对照法，即采用交叉胶布粘贴法、拔针后采用指压法(A法)和不交叉胶布粘贴法及拔针 后用大鱼际按压法(B法)并进行比较。 结果 B法明显优于A法，两组比较差异有显著性(PO．05)。 结论 用不 交叉胶布粘贴法、拔针后用大鱼际按压法对减轻疼痛及静脉穿刺后皮下瘀血、局部血肿有明显效果，具有临床应用意义。 【关键词】 静脉； 穿刺； 粘贴法； 大鱼际； 按压 【中图分类号】 R472．9 【文献标识码】 A 【文章编号】 1672—3511(2OO8)O2一O415一O3 Comparison of the effectiveness between two sticking ways of adhesive tapes for transfusion and two pressing ways after needle withdrawal YANG Dan，HE Yue-hua，ZHANG Shi—huai，et al (Urological Dept．of NO．2 Hospital of Yibin，Yitnn 644000，Sichuan，China) [Abstract] Objective To study the effectiveness between the two sticking ways of adhesive tapes for transfusion and two pressing ways after needle withdrawa1．Methods 101 cases needed transfusion were included into this study． During different periods of transfusion，the transfusion needle of every patient was fixed with traditional cross-over adhesive plaster，and traditional finge卜pressing was used after needle withdrawal(method A)；and for the same patient，the needle was fixed with uncross—over adhesive plaster and then thenar—pressing was used after needle withdrawal(method B)．The effectiveness was compared between the two methods． Results Method B was superior to method A，and the difference of two methods was statistically significant(PO．05)．Conclusion The effectiveness is evident tO palliate pain and subcutaneous ecchymosis and local haematoma by using uncross adhesive plaster to fix the transfusion needle during transfusion and thenar—pressing after needle withdrawa1． [Key words] Veins； Puncture； Thenar eminence；