模糊要素相对比较的量化标度法(Quantitative scaling method for relative comparison of fuzzy elements).doc
- 1、本文档共14页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
模糊要素相对比较的量化标度法(Quantitative scaling method for relative comparison of fuzzy elements)
模糊要素相对比较的量化标度法(Quantitative scaling method for relative comparison of fuzzy elements)
This article is contributed by evtnvt4upy
Pdf documents may experience poor browsing on the WAP side. It is recommended that you first select TXT, or download the source file to the local view.
-}
19 years, fourth, 91
Journal of Yuzhou University (NATURAL SCIENCE EDITION) JOURNALOFYUZHOUUNIVERSTYI
Total twentieth phases
Quantitative scaling method for relative comparison of fuzzy elements
Zhong Wei Qian
(Ji a line) Jing
The comparison between fuzzy elements: the bun spot policy there are a lot of, puts forward a simple and abstract
The scientific quantification scale makes the judgment matrix of the structure consistent with the good
Reliable basis. Off - adjustment: fuzzy factors, quantitative scaling method
The fundamental problem is the decision-making according to a certain criteria, rejection rejection effect maximization principle of brake, choose an ideal muscle of a set of known schemes (best) scheme. For the decision making problem of social economic system, the difficulty is to make quantitative or quantitative analysis on it
The measure is not easy to achieve, so a great social economic system decision, often convened a group of experts and scholars, rely on everyones experience, knowledge and even personality to judge, to complete the evaluation. In order to solve the human judgment error evaluation of the people to come up with fuzzy factors scoring approach, based on their scores to to determine the degree of influence of these factors on the decision goal (i.e. weights), which is a great progress. In dozens of scoring. There is a 9 - degree method (table I) are often used, is also in line with the 7 project is the standard criterion of.1 psychology limit see Table 1, 9 + 2 degrees by value meaning in Lu Fu down
This document received date: 19 - 82919. O
.
However, this method has difficulty in practical application, make the decision maker (as leader) and non special
您可能关注的文档
- 电力设备拆装评估参考.doc
- 甲虫发动机.ppt
- 电力课程计划.doc
- 电力和发电机.ppt
- 电力载波通信的发展与特征.doc
- 电力和能源的变化.doc
- 电力需求侧管理的基本概念.ppt
- 电力通信的意义和功能.doc
- 电力线载波通信课件.ppt
- 电力过载分析和优化.doc
- 部分可观测性下组合任务运动一种基于优化方法camille phiquepal 1153.pdf
- pcf2测量报告全尺寸part.pdf
- 画猫男孩级读者剧场剧本根据民间故事改编由kitty the boy who drew cats.pdf
- 文本说明二阶段-2x1000mw1acfc.pdf
- 批准hcki534d 544d-绕组技术数据表hcki5d 17 td en rev.pdf
- uu24m6-检测按键灯网口等.pdf
- 文案技术数据表2007technical datasheet.pdf
- 3g sleep mode application note睡眠模式应用程序说明.pdf
- 芯驿电子科技教程302 petalinux安装.pdf
- 案例shapemonkey用户指南2017 dan ebberts orrin user.pdf
文档评论(0)