语言的取值与置信——对语言学研究对象的哲学分析.PDFVIP

“语言与价值”国际学术研讨会（2011 北京师范大学） 语言的取值与置信 ——对语言学研究对象的哲学分析 邹晓辉1,2，邹顺鹏1** （1. 中国地质大学（北京）高等教育研究所； 2. 中美合作项目：塞尔研究双语信息处理课题组） qhkjy@ 摘要：本文报告这么一项研究成果，即：在以印欧语言为例的普通语言学里不明确的研究对 象，却由于笔者在学习以汉语为例的普通语言学基础研究中探寻如何解决汉语理论界分别坚 持字词本位的两派学者之间的尖锐冲突难题的过程中，运用语言哲学的取值与置信的基本方 法得到了较为满意的分析结果。具体地说，本文的目的是通过言本位的确立而解决汉语理论 的字本位和词本位的冲突，其意义在于它不仅解决了汉语理论研究的一个基本问题，而且， 还解决了普通语言学研究的一个根本问题。本文的研究方法是在以汉语为例的普通语言学基 础理论研究中采用语言哲学的价值判断与置信假设相结合的分析方法。 关键词：语言哲学；置信；普通语言学；取值 Value-Taking and Confidence-Building as Language Using -- Philosophy Analysis on the Object of Study in Linguistics ZOU Xiaohui1,2 , ZOU Shunpeng1 (1. China University of Geosciences (Beijing) Institute of Higher Education; 2. SINO-US Project: Searle Research of Bilingual Information Processing Research Group) qhkjy@ Abstract: In this paper the authors report such a research result, namely: the unclear object of study in General Linguistics, which takes the Indo-European languages as examples, yields more satisfactory results through using basic methods of value-choosing and confidence-building as language using in philosophy of language by the authors’ fundamental research in general linguistics taking Chinese language as an example, particularly in exploring how to solve the sharp conflict between two schools of scholars among workers, who adhere to Zi-based linguist theory and Ci-based linguist theory respectively. Specifically, the purpose of this paper is to solve the conflict between both Zi-based view and Ci-based view by using the basic unit of Chinese theory. The significance of our paper lies not only in solving the fundamental problem in theory re