apmptcri中能量x射线之比对规划-bipm.pdfVIP

下载本文档

2
0
约 30页
2017-08-16 发布于天津
举报
版权申诉

apmptcri中能量x射线之比对规划-bipm.pdf

1、本文档共30页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

apmptcri中能量x射线之比对规划-bipm

Metrologia 54 (2017) Tech. Suppl. 06003 APMP supplementary Comparison Report of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation (BIPM KCDB: APMP.RI(I)-S2) a a a b c c c M. Kato , T. Kurosawa , N. Saito , T. B. Kadni , I.J. Kim , B.C. Kim , C.-Y. Yi , V. Pungkund and C.-H. Chue aNational Metrology Institute of Japan, AIST, 1-1-1 Umezono Tsukuba, 305-8568 Japan bMalaysian Nuclear Agency, Bangi, 43000 Kajang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia cKorea Research Institute of Standards and Science, 1 Doryong-Dong Yusong-Gu Deajeon 305-340, Korea dOffice of Atoms for Peace, 16 Vibhavadi Rangsit Road, Laadyaw, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand eInstitute of Nuclear Energy Research, No 1000, Wuhua Rd., Jiaan Village, Longtan Township, Taoyuan County, 32546, Taiwan Abstract The supplementary comparison of absorbed dose rate in tissue for beta radiation (APMP.RI(I)-S2) was performed with five national metrology institutes in 2013 and 2014. Two commercial thin window ionization chambers were used as transfer instruments and circulated among the participants. Two of the NMIs measured the calibration coefficients of the chambers in reference fields produced from Pm-147, Kr-85 and Sr-90/Y-90, while the other three measured those only in Sr-90/Y-90 beta-particle field. The degree of equivalence for the participants was determined and this comparison verifies the calibration capabilities of the participating laboratories. In addition, most of the results of this comparison are consistent with another internati