托福综合写作肺腑之言-智课教育旗下智课教育.pdfVIP

托福综合写作肺腑之言-智课教育旗下智课教育.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
托福综合写作肺腑之言-智课教育旗下智课教育

智 课 网 托 福 备 考 资 料 托福综合写作肺腑之言-智课教育旗下智课教育 托福综合写作主要是考查将阅读和听力部分的内容,构思综合写作 的范文。但是,综合写作并不是简单的语句堆积,还要注意写作的称呼 。 托福综合写作主要是考查将阅读和听力部分的内容,构思综合写作 的范文。但是,综合写作并不是简单的语句堆积,还要注意写作的称呼 ,词汇的使用以及逻辑结构的整理。所以,智课教育小编将从以上三点 和大家分析托福综合写作。 一、基本点: 基本称呼:Author,reading passage; Lecturer, Professor, speaker, 基本反驳词汇: But, However, On the other hand, In contrast, Contrary to, Argument ,According, 基本副词: Completely, Entirely, Directly, 中奖词汇(支持):Support, Enhance, Uphold, Justify 二、逻辑结构分类及支撑词汇 第一类: R 立论, L反驳 一、定逻辑框架:Challenges/ Deny The lecturer contradicts(开头显得厚重些) the author’s conclusion that R观点, with challenging the three statements made by the author, respectively. 基本词汇: The author states/contends/believes /demonstrate/indicates/holds/ that….. The lecture argues/ opposite this opinion and believes/ contradicts/ casts serious doubt on/ skeptical about the author’s point that 二、论证方法一: 质疑 Lecturer casts serious doubt on the idea that 1. If理论,then there would have to be 相应结论,but there were very few 质疑点。 If hundreds of people were living in the great houses, then there would have to be many fireplaces, where each family did its daily cooking, but there are very few fireplaces. 2. If 理论,why isn’t there 推论? If the great houses were used for storage, why isn’t there more spilled maize on the floor? Why aren’t there more remains of big containers? 论证方法二:直接反驳 Conclusion is unsupported by evidence/isn’t well supported either 1. The presence 论据doesn’ t prove that conclusion. The presence of dinosaur fossils in polar region doesn’t prove the dinosaurs were endotherms. 2. That doesn’t necessary mean 论点. There is another explanation for 论点. That doesn’t necessarily mean dinosaurs were high-energy endotherms built for running. There is another explanation for having legs under the body. 3. ×××× doesn’t have to be / do ××××× to do s

文档评论(0)

ranfand + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档