常见的24条逻辑谬论（24 common logical fallacy）.docVIP

常见的24条逻辑谬论（24 common logical fallacy） Just as Carl Jung and Freud diverged, they did not want to be impregnable fortress, but the ultimate truth The communication of any person is not for defeating each other 24 common logical fallacies Catalog Item 1: Scarecrow Second: error attribution Third: appeal to feelings Fourth: fallacy Fifth: landslide fallacy Sixth: personal attacks Seventh: appeal to hypocrisy Eighth: personal doubt Ninth: one-sided fallacy Tenth: the problem of induction Eleventh: the burden of proof Twelfth: semantic fuzziness Thirteenth: gamblers fallacy Fourteenth: the band floats Fifteenth: appeal to authority Sixteenth: synthetic fallacy Seventeenth: there are no real Scots Eighteenth: genetic fallacy Nineteenth: black or white Twentieth: stealing arguments Twenty-first: appeal to nature Twenty-second: anecdotal evidence Twenty-third: Texas sharpshooter Twenty-fourth: middle ground Item 1: Scarecrow You distort other peoples ideas so that you can attack others more easily. You exaggerate, distort, or even create other peoples opinions out of thin air to make your point of view seem more reasonable. This is an extremely dishonest act, which not only affects rational discussion, but also affects the credibility of your own views. Because if you can distort other peoples views negatively, you may distort your views from the positive side. Example: Xiaoming said the country should invest more budget to the development of education industry, Alice replied: I cant imagine you are so unpatriotic, actually want to reduce defense spending, to take advantage of foreign powers. Xiao Hong made the scarecrow mistake. Second: error attribution You may have a correlation between the two things, and you can see that one thing is the cause of another. When you see two things at the same time, you feel that one of these things is the cause of the other. Your mistake is that the two things at the same time are not necessarily causal. Maybe the two things have a commo