议论要有理有据作文教案(附范文)（Talk to (with examples) reasonable composition teaching）.docVIP

议论要有理有据作文教案(附范文)（Talk to (with examples) reasonable composition teaching） Talk to (with examples) reasonable composition teaching [Objective] to learn 1, the correct argument, novel, targeted The 2 argument, reliable, typical and fresh [learning difficulty] novel argument, using fresh arguments. Import: 1, a composition of the formation of the idea of the article: moderation conception -- organizational language -- revise 2, master Zhu Guangqian once said: the facts and truth, in our daily life has become more and more widely, more and more important social activities. Meeting to report to do reasoning, reasoning, reasoning to write editorial, writing a textbook to argue...... anyway, those who need to use our brains, those who want to defend themselves, to convince others, there is no reason. If Mr. Zhu stressed the importance of talk . All talk, have the facts and truth. You dont really care about how to write essays, because the Wuding method. The key is to solve the problem and people dont know people believe the problem. An essay, just do not pay attention to reasonable argument is empty and abstract, the lack of a real sense; but only stick to the facts and reasoning, lack of theoretical depth. So, the be found. An argument There is a Chinese teacher in my composition class to a flat ball and pump into the classroom, he patted the ball first, and then give the ball up, and then pat the ball. After the teachers action done, ask students to express their views on this, write a 800 word essay. Students view, more focused view there are four: first, the flat ball is a kind of self protection, play the ball will kick to harm yourself; dont be like the flat ball has no vitality; the ball to encourage people to live up to expectations; the only continue to enrich themselves in order to make a difference in the life of the arena. The students put forward their own views and opinions, ideas, this is the argument, this is the argumentative author to prove the viewpoint,