关于案外人执行异议之诉的诉讼标的--_--以对房地产执行提起的异议之诉为的分析研究视角.pdfVIP

内容摘要 我国的执行救济制度，长期只有形式化审查，缺乏实体审查程序。从大陆法系国家 和地区来看，案外人对执行标的主张实体权利，比较通行的做法是设立第三人异议之诉。 因此，我国 2007 年修改的民事诉讼法设立了案外人执行异议之诉，即案外人在提出执 行异议被驳回后，对执行标的主张实体权利的，可以在十五日内通过提起诉讼的方式进 行实体审查。然而在我国的民事审判实践中，由于对该类诉讼的诉讼标的认识偏差，使 得在审理案件过程中对于当事人的诉讼请求的认定和适用的法律选择甚至是判决主文 的表述都出现了不同。 本文运用比较分析的方法，通过考察案外人异议之诉的诉讼类型，在对诉讼标的学 说和理论进行梳理的基础上，明确案外人异议之诉的诉讼标的，进而围绕诉讼标的对该 类案件在审理过程中应当适用的法律和判决主文的表述进行明确，解决该类案件在现今 审判实践中发生的争议和困扰，推动执行救济制度的发展，维护案外人的合法权益。 关键词 案外人执行异议之诉 诉讼标的 执行救济措施 物权行为 债权行为 1 Abstract Remedy system for execution in our country has long been formally reviewed in the form, without the lack of substantive review procedure. From countries and regions with the civil law, it is the common practice for the substantive rights on object of execution by the non-involver to set up the litigation of dissertation by the third party. Therefore, the civil procedural law amended in 2007 in our country set up the litigation of dissertation by the non-involver, that is, where the non-involver claims substantive rights on object of execution after the dissertation of execution by the non-involver is rejected, the object may be substantively reviewed by means of lawsuit within fifteen days. However in the civil trial practice in our country, the deviation of understanding on the object of litigation of such cases makes the difference in the identification of the request of the party concerned, the law applied and even the expressions in the main body of judgment in the trial process. This thesis, by means of comparative analysis, by reviewing the type of the case of non-involver’s dissertation and based on the overview of the doctrine and theory of, defines t