140412中美医疗设计对比-上海分析.pptxVIP

： ·;;;;Market driven Minimize patient movement Maximize staff efficiency Patient Privacy Maximize construction value (private finance) Sustainablity via maxing life cycle cost and minimize operational costs Fit into existing campus with options for growth ;More commonly additions and renovations Specialties driven by consider demand More Innovation and more fast change with new trend which bring more challenges to designers Need for flexibility and Expansion Efficient compact facilities Access primarily by car ;美国医疗 American Healthcare ;Multiple spread out DT to reduce patient movement Sterile materials delivered from adjacent sterile core Patient is considered the least sterile Separate corridor s for medical staff and public or family ;Commonly deployed closer, or within ED and Surgery Modular planning to increase flexibility Higher use of hybrid OR with Imaging Imaging document electronically shared ;Hybrid OR;Hybrid OR;Operating rooms 40-85 square meters Access is via a sterile core Sterile core with direct access to sterile processing Heavy use for OP procedures Sterile supplies arrives via a steriile core ;Hybrid OR;More procedures thus more prep and recovery spaces required 1.5 bays in PACU per OR 2.0 bays Recovery per OR Fewer VIP spaces ;Patients commonly start at ED Patients pushed through an urgent core system Treatment provided in Separated bays Privacy is a strong priority Patient pushed home or to in-patient ;Commonly 1 bed per room Nurse Station with small nurse stations near rooms Rooms face in any direction with little nature ventilation Room with separate zones for family and care givers More hotel like Specialized elevator groups per function ;Private rooms 34 square meters Semi-Private 45 square meters Patient Toilet 5-6 square meters Average 16rooms per Nurse Station with 16 beds ;Decentralized nursing area between patient rooms Walls pulled back to create space for family / doctor discussion ;Private ro