- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
国产微螺钉种植体支抗稳定性临床研究
国产微螺钉种植体支抗稳定性临床研究[摘要]目的:统计国产微螺钉种植体的脱落率,分析不同加载时机对种植体稳定性的影响。寻找临床上的最佳加载时机。方法:采用回顾性分析的方法,对39例就诊于西安交通大学口腔医院正畸科的患者植入的微螺钉种植体支抗资料进行回顾,分类并统计,根据不同加载情况将种植体归为即刻加载组,两周加载组和不加载组3组,分别对3组种植体临床脱落情况进行统计,得出各组种植体脱落率;根据实验研究的结果,分析影响稳定性的因素。比较不同加载状态对种植体稳定性的影响以及可能影响脱落率的因素。结果:两周后加载的种植体脱落率表现得最低为10%,即刻加载组脱落率为50%;而不加力组脱落率最高为79%。结论:种植体植入后两周加载对于种植体稳定性比不加载稳定性要高;即刻加力的种植体稳定性比不加力的种植体稳定性差。
[关键词]种植体支抗;临床研究
[中图分类号]R783.5 [文献标识码]A [文章编号]1008-6455(2011)10-1598-03
Clinic application of the stability about Home-made Titanium Microscrew Implant In the different loading occasions
KANG Jing,ZHOU Hong,An Xiao-li
(1.Department of Orthodontics, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Medical School of Xi’an Jiaotong Universtity, Xi’an 710004,Shaanxi,China;2. Department of Orthodontics, the Affiliated Stomatological Hospital, Medical School ofLanzhou Universtity)
Abstract:ObjectivesTo evaluate the effects of the different loading occasions, by clinic study.Methods The sample consisted of 39 patients (male 11,female 28,12 to 31 years old,averaged 21.5),whose canine, premolar or maxillary first molar need to be moved distally with microscrew implants as anchorage.These samples were divided into 3 groups for the loading occasion. The groups include unloaded group,immediate group and loading group after 2 weeks.Statistical analysis was done in order to compare the ablating rate of research I and research III and attempt to find out the infections about the ablating rate.ResultsComparing of the implant’s ablating rate of animal experiment,it was found that the implant’s ablating rate of the loading group after 2 weeks was the lowest in three groups.In another word, loading after 2 weeks was the best. In the immediate group,the implant’s ablating rate was 50% whether animal experiment or clinical application.But in animal experiment,unloading group owned the lower ablating rate than immediate group.In clinical application,unloading group owned the higher ablating rate than immediate group.This was the d
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 基于核心素养小学数学计算教学研究.doc VIP
- 2024江西赣州市国资委招聘出资监管企业内设监事会人员21人【综合基础知识500题】高频考点模拟试题及参考答案解析.docx VIP
- Shimano禧玛诺渔具 电动轮BeastMaster 2000EJ(04163)说明书.pdf
- 卫生院科室设置及职能范文.docx
- 北京市大兴区2023-2024学年九年级上学期期中数学试题.docx
- 铝合金门窗节能专项施工方案.doc
- 经典成语故事郑人买履.ppt VIP
- 基于核心素养小学数学计算教学研究.doc VIP
- 2024-2030年中国化工仓储行业市场发展趋势与前景展望战略分析报告.docx
- WST 356-2024 参考物质互换性评估指南.pdf
文档评论(0)