assessing bias the qualitative in the quantitative, darfuri war fatalities and the morality of war评估偏差的定性定量,达尔富尔战争死亡和战争的道德.pdfVIP

下载本文档

1
0
约8.5万字
约 9页
2017-08-27 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

assessing bias the qualitative in the quantitative, darfuri war fatalities and the morality of war评估偏差的定性定量,达尔富尔战争死亡和战争的道德.pdf

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

assessing bias the qualitative in the quantitative, darfuri war fatalities and the morality of war评估偏差的定性定量,达尔富尔战争死亡和战争的道德

Socilogy Mind 2011. Vol.1, No.3, 105-113 Copyright © 2011 SciRes. DOI:10.4236/sm.2011.13013 Assessing Bias: The Qualitative in the Quantitative, Darfuri War * Fatalities and the Morality of War Stephen Reyna Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute University of Manchester Max Planck Institute of Social Anthropology Email: reyna@eth.mpg.de th th nd Received February 4 , 2011; revised March 19 , 2011; accepted April 22 , 2011. This paper formulates a strategy for assessing bias, and applies it to quantitative assessments of the disaster of war in Darfur [Sudan]. In so doing it argues for qualitative investigations of quantitative analyses. The strategy examines epistemic and political regimes with the goal of revealing the sources, the directions, and the forces of bias. Examples of bias are discussed to illustrate the strategy including, among others, the draw-a-person IQ test, questions about how old you are or whether you can bear children in Chad, and the US army’s Human Terrain System. Considerable attention is paid to US governmental biasing of its claims of war fatalities and genocide in Darfur. This biasing is shown to