comparison of analytic hierarchy process and dominance-based rough set approach as multi-criteria decision aid methods for the selection of investment projects比较层次分析法和dominance-based援助方法粗糙集方法在多标准的决策投资项目的选择.pdfVIP

comparison of analytic hierarchy process and dominance-based rough set approach as multi-criteria decision aid methods for the selection of investment projects比较层次分析法和dominance-based援助方法粗糙集方法在多标准的决策投资项目的选择.pdf

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
comparison of analytic hierarchy process and dominance-based rough set approach as multi-criteria decision aid methods for the selection of investment projects比较层次分析法和dominance-based援助方法粗糙集方法在多标准的决策投资项目的选择

American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2012, 2, 7-12 7 /10.4236/ajibm.2012.21002 Published Online January 2012 (http://www.SciRP.org/journal/ajibm) Comparison of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach as Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Methods for the Selection of Investment Projects * * Bryan Boudreau-Trudel , Kazimierz Zaras Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, Canada * * Email: { boudreab, kazimierz.zaras}@uqat.ca Received September 29th, 2011; revised November 28th, 2011; accepted December 20th, 2011 ABSTRACT This investigation compares two multi-criteria analysis methods, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Dominance- based Rough Set Approach (DRSA), applied to the ranking of ten investment projects based on evaluation of the overall risk associated with each. AHP requires decision makers to evaluate the various elements of risk by paired comparison in terms of their impact on the element above them in the hierarchy. Each investment project is then rated in terms of each risk to produce a weighted summation used for ranking purposes. DRSA produces a ranking based on a set of de- cision rules that are derived from evaluation of a reduced number of reference projects well known to the decision mak- ers. For this purpose, four reference projects were chosen from the ten. The results show that the two methods gave very similar final rankings of the ten projects. The advantage of DRSA is that the projects are evaluated using a reduced number of attributes without explicit knowledge of their impact in the hierarchy, thus eliminating a lengthy and tedious process for the decision makers. Keywords: Analytic Hierarchy Process; Dominance-Based Rough Set Approach; Management Decision Support System; Multi-Criteria Analysi

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档