网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

translation invariance and finite additivity in a probability measure on the natural numbers平移不变性和有限可加性概率测度的自然数.pdf

translation invariance and finite additivity in a probability measure on the natural numbers平移不变性和有限可加性概率测度的自然数.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
translation invariance and finite additivity in a probability measure on the natural numbers平移不变性和有限可加性概率测度的自然数

IJMMS 29:10 (2002) 585–589 PII. S0161171202007494 © Hindawi Publishing Corp. TRANSLATION INVARIANCE AND FINITE ADDITIVITY IN A PROBABILITY MEASURE ON THE NATURAL NUMBERS ROBERT GARDNER and ROBERT PRICE Received 30 April 2001 Inspired by the “two envelopes exchange paradox,” a finitely additive probability mea- sure m on the natural numbers is introduced. The measure is uniform in the sense that m( {i}) = m( {j }) for all i,j ∈ N. The measure is shown to be translation invariant and has such desirable properties as m( {i ∈ N | i ≡ 0(mod2)}) = 1/2. For any r ∈ [0, 1], a set A is constructed such that m(A) = r ; however, m is not defined on the power set of N. Finally, a resolution to the two envelopes exchange paradox is presented in terms of m. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 60A10. 1. Introduction. In recent work on the so-called “two envelopes exchange paradox” (cf. Broome [1] and Nalebuff [4]), it has been proposed that the commonly used as- sumption of countable additivity for probability distributions be dropped [5]. The two envelopes problem is as follows: a random (positive) amount of money is put in an envelope O. A coin is flipped and if the coin comes up heads, twice the amount of money in envelope O is put in a second envelope (call it T ) and if the coin comes up tails, half the amount of money in envelope O is put in envelope T . The paradox arises by reasoning that if we choose one envelope (no matter which one) then there is a 50% chance that the other envelope contains one-half the amount we hold, and there is a 50% chance that the other envelope contains twice the amount we hold. That is, the other envelope has an expected value of 1 .25 times the amount in the envelope we hold. This expect

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xyz118 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档