原野（A wide field）.docVIP

原野（A wide field） The received date: 2003-10-31 [biography] Guang Ming (1979-), male, Hubei Xiantao, Beijing Normal University, Chinese contemporary literature, masters degree. 2004 issue third Twenty-eighth volumes (total 123rd issues) Journal of Shenyang Normal University (SOCIAL SCIENCE EDITION) Viewing the acceptance of wilderness from the history of performance Guangmingming (School of Arts, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875) [Abstract] since its birth, wilderness has been repeatedly moved onto stage and screen. Looking back on the history of its performance in the past 60 years, we can see that it has formed two kinds Basic acceptance model. The recipient accepts or judges it from its social meaning or accepts it as a drama with a strong color. his Among them, the former acceptance model has been occupying the mainstream position in the history of wilderness for more than 60 years. A wilderness; a performance; acceptance [CLC number] I207.34 [document identification code] A [article number 1000-5226 (2004) 03-0076-05 Wilderness since April 1937 magazine published in series, was criticized by many reviewers, even alleged Cao Yus failure of a work 1 (P362). But it is such a failure of the play, for more than 60 years, but long acting, showing extraordinary artistic charm. As a play, the history of acceptance of wilderness should undoubtedly be based on the history of performance. The general process of accepting. We can make the following description: the performers on the stage for the script interpretation, one is subject to the era of specialized or amateur reviewers accept status, and reflects this situation; on the other hand, there is an ordinary individual to accept the script again create. Their performance was transmitted directly to the audience, thus stimulating the audiences acceptance of the play. In the chain of acceptance that consists of reviewers, performers (including directors, etc.) and viewers (including reviewers in broad sense), the