反传统心理学（Anti traditional psychology）.docVIP

反传统心理学（Anti traditional psychology） Why isnt nature always necessary? From the contents of the sixth chapter, we can clearly see why such criticism is unreasonable. As stated in the previous chapter, the artificiality of scientific experimentation is not a drawback; in fact, it is a strange force that enables us to interpret the world. Contrary to what people commonly believe, the artificiality of scientific experimentation is not accidental negligence, but the deliberate use of it by scientists. The reason why scientists set special conditions for unnatural occurrence is that only in this way can they distinguish many related variables that determine the occurrence of events. Sometimes, the necessary conditions already exist in the state of nature, such as snow and cholera. But this does not happen very often. Scientists must use new and sometimes even more strange ways to manipulate events, such as Goldberg and pellagra examples. Most of the time, these operations can not be done in the natural environment, so scientists have to transfer the phenomena they want to study to the laboratory, in order to implement more precise control. For example, in the early study of gravity and motion, some special objects were used to create special conditions to observe the motion of objects. Therefore, in order to analyze a phenomenon, it is often necessary to create unnatural extremes. In fact, if scientists are completely imprisoned in the natural conditions observed, then some phenomena can not be found. Physicists who explored the nature of matter constructed giant accelerators to induce collisions between elementary particles. Some of the byproducts of collisions are new particles with a time of less than 1/1000000000 seconds. The properties of these new particles, however, help to explain the theory of atomic structure. Many new particles do not exist in the world, and even if they exist, we do not have the opportunity to observe them in natural conditions. As a result, f