demo-ii trial. aerobic exercise versus stretching exercise in patients with major depression—a randomised clinical trialdemo-ii审判。.pdfVIP

  • 1
  • 0
  • 约8.16万字
  • 约 10页
  • 2017-09-01 发布于上海
  • 举报

demo-ii trial. aerobic exercise versus stretching exercise in patients with major depression—a randomised clinical trialdemo-ii审判。.pdf

demo-ii trial. aerobic exercise versus stretching exercise in patients with major depression—a randomised clinical trialdemo-ii审判。

DEMO-II Trial. Aerobic Exercise versus Stretching Exercise in Patients with Major Depression—A Randomised Clinical Trial 1 2 3 4 1 Jesper Krogh *, Poul Videbech , Carsten Thomsen , Christian Gluud , Merete Nordentoft 1 Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2 Institute for Basic Psychiatric Research, Department ˚ of Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital, Arhus, Risskov, Denmark, 3 Department of Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4 Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark Abstract Background: The effect of referring patients from a clinical setting to a pragmatic exercise intervention for depressive symptoms, cognitive function, and metabolic variables has yet to be determined. Methods: Outpatients with major depression (DSM-IV) were allocated to supervised aerobic or stretching exercise groups during a three months period. The primary outcome was the Hamilton depression score (HAM-D17). Secondary outcomes were cognitive function, cardiovascular risk markers, and employment related outcomes. Results: 56 participants were allocated to the aerobic exercise intervention versus 59 participants to the stretching exercise group. Post intervention the mean difference between groups was 20.78 points on the HAM-D17 (95% CI 23.2 to 1.6; P = .52). At follow-up, the participants in the aerobic exercise group had higher maximal oxygen uptake (mean difference 4.4 l/kg/min; 95% CI 1.7 to 7.0; P = .001) and visuospatial memory on Rey’s Complex Fig

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档