analysis of the relationship between trips and the acta and impact assessment in china(分析之间的关系在中国旅行和学报影响评估).doc

analysis of the relationship between trips and the acta and impact assessment in china(分析之间的关系在中国旅行和学报影响评估).doc

  1. 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
analysis of the relationship between trips and the acta and impact assessment in china(分析之间的关系在中国旅行和学报影响评估)

Analysis of the relationship between TRIPS and the ACTA and impact assessment in China Compared with the TRIPS ACTA papers, mainly in enforcement intensify. ACTA to apply the TRIPS objectives and principles, but does not reflect the specific provisions of the latter without prejudice to the interests of free trade balance and the objectives and principles. ACTA through the strengthening of enforcement of intellectual property rights of its States Parties to the radiation non-parties, including China. Paper Keywords: intellectual property protection; the interests of balance, the influence of China In 2006, the United States and Japan, the first to propose actions to create a multilateral anti-counterfeiting agreement since the start of 2008 lt;lt;Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreementgt;gt; (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, referred to the Tokyo Round negotiations in Geneva ACTA negotiations, ACTA after two years, eleven talks, participating countries are mostly the main producer and exporter of intellectual property developed countries. negotiations have been conducted in secret, until the 2010.4.21 was the first official public draft agreement text as its purpose is to reduce the country’s intellectual property input participation of developing countries to reduce barriers to negotiation, to accelerate the process of its formation, but ‘they engage in consultation is a vital intellectual property agreement’, American University of fair information and intellectual property, said Sean Flynn, deputy director of the project , ‘did not adopt the views of stakeholders to reach an agreement, which will greatly damage the legitimacy of the agreement.’ 1 ACTA compared with an overview of TRIPS 1.1 to expand the scope of application Bans, ACTA objects to increase the ban to extend to the application, thus increasing the use of civil enforcement approach this possibility in accordance with TRIPS Article 44 in case of infringement of a third party, such a

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档