从曹海鑫案看中国的司法改革（Judicial reform in China from Cao Haixins case）.docVIP

下载本文档

5
0
约1.35万字
约 8页
2017-09-06 发布于河南
举报
版权申诉

从曹海鑫案看中国的司法改革（Judicial reform in China from Cao Haixins case）.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

从曹海鑫案看中国的司法改革（Judicial reform in China from Cao Haixins case）

从曹海鑫案看中国的司法改革（Judicial reform in China from Cao Haixins case） See from the case of Cao Haixin China judicial reform Author: Chen Ruihua / Du Baoshen Looked at the hands of the Provincial Higher Peoples Court (1998) No. 249th criminal ruling, heavy in the heart: the life of a person and it was our judicial organs in the name of the country deprived! The case has left so many questions, raises questions and dissatisfaction with so many people and even celebrities in cultural circles, even disturb the central leadership. (see todays celebrities in 1999 third, fourth to 12 pages) the legal issues involved in the case of Cao Haixin, the entity is more involved in the theory of criminal law, the crime constitution of self-defense and other complex conditions, evidence can also extend the admissibility, relevance, probative force the qualification of the witness testimony, and the effect that a series of issues such as liability. On these issues, a lot of justification for Cao Haixins defense counsel are not adopted by the court. For these problems, the author cannot give proper comments, and want to start legal proceedings from the case involved, discuss the necessity and urgency of Chinese judicial reform. This is an experienced complete criminal procedure cases: the defendant Cao Haixin on September 1995 was detained on suspicion of intentional homicide, was arrested in October of the same year; May 1997 was sentenced guilty of intentional homicide and sentenced to death, deprived of political rights for life; thereafter, the defendant refused to accept the verdict, an appeal; a senior peoples court legally formed a collegial panel, the trial of the case, but in the secret investigation and review submitted the judicial committee discussed and decided , and make the final decision on September 1998: rejected the appeal and upheld the original ; at the same time, the ruling also stated: this ruling to approve the defendant Cao Haixin to death, deprived of political right