a comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives laminated timber or reinforced concrete比较cradle-to-gate中高层的办公楼建筑的生命周期评估选择复合木材或混凝土.pdfVIP

下载本文档

16
0
约10.38万字
约 26页
2017-09-07 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

a comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives laminated timber or reinforced concrete比较cradle-to-gate中高层的办公楼建筑的生命周期评估选择复合木材或混凝土.pdf

1、本文档共26页，可阅读全部内容。
2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
5、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
6、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
7、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

a comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of mid-rise office building construction alternatives laminated timber or reinforced concrete比较cradle-to-gate中高层的办公楼建筑的生命周期评估选择复合木材或混凝土

Buildings 2012, 2, 245-270; doi:10.3390/buildings2030245 OPEN ACCESS buildings ISSN 2075-5309 /journal/buildings/ Article A Comparative Cradle-to-Gate Life Cycle Assessment of Mid-Rise Office Building Construction Alternatives: Laminated Timber or Reinforced Concrete Adam B. Robertson 1,*, Frank C. F. Lam 2 and Raymond J. Cole 3 1 Canadian Wood Council, 400-99 Bank Street, Ottawa, ON K1P 6B9, Canada 2 Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; E-Mail: frank.lam@ubc.ca 3 School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture, University of British Columbia, 6333 Memorial Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada; E-Mail: rcole@sala.ubc.ca * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: adam.robertson@alumni.ubc.ca; Tel.: +1-613-747-5544; Fax: +1-613-747-6264. Received: 23 April 2012; in revised form: 25 June 2012 / Accepted: 26 June 2012 / Published: 17 July 2012 Abstract: The objective of this project was to quantify and compare the environmental impacts associated with alternative designs for a typical North American mid-rise office building. Two scenarios were considered; a traditional cast-in-place, reinforced concrete frame and a laminated timber hybrid design, which utilized engineered wood products (cross-laminated timber (CLT) and glulam). The boundary of the quantitative analysis was cradle-to-construction site gate and encompassed the