a forest management process to incorporate multiple objectives a framework for systematic public input森林管理过程包含多个目标的框架系统的公共输入.pdfVIP

a forest management process to incorporate multiple objectives a framework for systematic public input森林管理过程包含多个目标的框架系统的公共输入.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共15页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
a forest management process to incorporate multiple objectives a framework for systematic public input森林管理过程包含多个目标的框架系统的公共输入

Forests 2010, 1, 99-113; doi:10.3390/f1030099 OPEN ACCESS forests ISSN 1999-4907 /journal/forests Article A Forest Management Process to Incorporate Multiple Objectives: a Framework for Systematic Public Input Shaik Md. Yousuf Hossain 1 and E.W. (Ted) Robak 2,* 1 Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto, 33 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3B3, Canada; E-Mail: shaik.hossain@utoronto.ca 2 Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick, BSN 44555, Fredericton, NB, E3B 6C2, Canada * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: robak@unb.ca; Tel.: +1-506-453-4932; Fax: +1-506-453-3538. Received: 6 July 2010 / Accepted: 30 July 2010 / Published: 30 July 2010 Abstract: A multi-objective forest management process employing mathematical programming and the analytic hierarchy process has been developed for systematically incorporating public input. The process was tested as a ―proof of concept‖ for four values and five stakeholders in Crown License 5 in New Brunswick. The impacts of tradeoffs among various weighting schemes were evaluated. Analyses of stakeholders‘ expected satisfaction were conducted for each scenario. The forest management implications of different weighting methods are discussed. Keywords: multi-objective forest management; systematic public input; mathematical programming; analytic hierarchy process

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

118zhuanqian + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档