access to scientific publications the scientists perspective获得科学出版物科学家的观点.pdfVIP

Access to Scientific Publications: The Scientist’s Perspective Yegor Voronin*, Askar Myrzahmetov, Alan Bernstein Global HIV Vaccine Enterprise, New York, New York, United States of America Abstract Background: Scientific publishing is undergoing significant changes due to the growth of online publications, increases in the number of open access journals, and policies of funders and universities requiring authors to ensure that their publications become publicly accessible. Most studies of the impact of these changes have focused on the growth of articles available through open access or the number of open-access journals. Here, we investigated access to publications at a number of institutes and universities around the world, focusing on publications in HIV vaccine research – an area of biomedical research with special importance to the developing world. Methods and Findings: We selected research papers in HIV vaccine research field, creating: 1) a first set of 50 most recently published papers with keywords ‘‘HIV vaccine’’ and 2) a second set of 200 articles randomly selected from those cited in the first set. Access to the majority (80%) of the recently published articles required subscription, while cited literature was much more accessible (67% freely available online). Subscriptions at a number of institutions around the world were assessed for providing access to subscription-only articles from the two sets. The access levels varied widely, ranging among institutions from 20% to 90%. Through the WHO-supported HINARI program, institutes in low-income countries had access comparable to that of institutes in the North. Finally, we examined the response rates for reprint requests sent to corresponding authors, a method commonly used before internet acc