网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

文拉法辛缓释剂及SSRTs治疗难治性抑郁症对照探究.doc

文拉法辛缓释剂及SSRTs治疗难治性抑郁症对照探究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共10页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
文拉法辛缓释剂及SSRTs治疗难治性抑郁症对照探究

文拉法辛缓释剂及SSRTs治疗难治性抑郁症对照探究  【关键词】; 难治性抑郁症;文拉法辛缓释剂;SSRIs;生存质量;汉密顿抑郁量表 毕业论文   【摘要】 目的; 探讨文拉法辛缓释剂治疗难治性抑郁症的临床疗效及安全性。 方法; 将60例难治性抑郁症患者随机分为两组各30例,分别给予文拉法辛缓释剂和SSRTs抗抑郁剂治疗,疗程12 mo。于治疗前及治疗1 mo、3 mo、6 mo、12 mo末采用汉密顿抑郁量表评定临床疗效,副反应量表评定不良反应,生存质量量表评定生存质量。结果; 汉密顿抑郁量表评分两组治疗1 mo末起均较治疗前有显著或极显著下降(P<0.05或0.01),两组间同期评分比较,研究组较对照组下降更显著(P<0.05)。生存质量量表评分两组治疗1 mo末起均较治疗前有显著或极显著升高(P<0.05或0.01),两组间同期评分比较,研究组心理领域、社会关系、环境因素因子分较对照组升高更显著(P<0.05或0.01)。两组不良反应均较轻微,除口干、多汗、便秘发生率两组有显著性差异(χ2=4.94,3.92,5.12,P<0.05)外,余差异无显著性。 结论; 文拉法辛缓释剂治疗难治性抑郁症疗效较SSRTs显著,且能显著改善患者的生存质量,安全性高,依从性好。 毕业论文   【关键词】 难治性抑郁症;文拉法辛缓释剂;SSRIs;生存质量;汉密顿抑郁量表 毕业论文   Control study of venlafaxine and SSRIs in the treatment of refractory depression 毕业论文   【Abstract】 Objective; To explore the clinical curative effect and safety of venlafaxine in refractory depression. Methods; 60 patients with refractory depression were randomly divided into study (venlafaxine) and control group(SSRIs) for 12 months. Before treatment and at the ends of 1st, 3rd, 6th and 12th month of; treatment, the clinical curative effects were assessed with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), adverse effects with the Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS) and quality of life with the WHO Quality of Life(WHOQOL). Results; At the end of 1st month , scores of the HAMD decreased significantly or very significantly for both the two groups compared with pretreatment(Plt;0.05 or 0.01),in corresponding period those of the research group did more significantly compared with the control group(Plt;0.05). At the end of 1st month, scores of the WHOQOL increased significantly or very significantly for both the two groups compared with pretreatment(Plt;0.05 or 0.01), in corresponding period scores of psycho domain, social relationship and environmental factor did more significantly in the research group compared with the control group(Plt;0.05 or 0.01).The adverse effects of both groups were mild, and there were significant differences in dry mouth, hyperhidrosis, constipation be

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档